Cycling - Comparing the costs
Here are some of the factors you may need to consider when counting the costs of your choice to use a bicycle over a car.
Initial outlay
- the cost of a bike is a fraction of that of a car
- interest lost is considerably less for a bike because of the lower cost
- depreciation is considerably less costly for a bike
Insurance
- minimum third party liability is mandatory by law for motorists. However cyclists do not, at this time, need insurance
- insurance against theft of a bike may be worthwhile
- membership of some cycling organisations includes insurance cover
Vehicle Excise Duty (VED)
- Vehicle Excise Duty is mandatory for most cars
- Vehicle excise duty on motorised vehicles is linked to vehicle emissions - very low emission vehicles (including electric vehicles) have a nil rate of duty
- Cycles, as the ultimate low emission vehicle, are not liable for VED
Ongoing costs
- an MOT test is required on all cars over four years old
- fuel costs is a major factor where cycling benefits over motoring
- maintenance and parts is another instance where cycling benefits over motoring
- parking charges for cars in most major town centres
- in many areas cycle parking, if available, is not secure and open to the elements, but is free
- Did you know? – travelling 10 miles by bike instead ofby carcould save youup to £1,700 each year
Support organisation
- this cost may not be absolutely necessary for cyclists or motorists but many consider it beneficial. An example of this would be breakdown recovery for motorists
- benefits from respective organisations are similar, although cycling groups include insurance
- for motorists, groups such as RAC and the AA can cost from approximately £30 a year upwards, depending on level of benefit sought
- for cyclists, groups such as CTC (Cyclists Touring Club) can cost approximately £30 per year (includes insurance)












Student finance information
Excuses
Enhance your English, maths and IT skills